Free search and download videos

A short explanation of the Apache Native American Indian resistance that happened in the Southwestern United States around the 1860s. There was an active slave trade in the south west that most people are unaware of. The western states were very important in the Civil War for the North. Gold from California and Silver from Nevada helped finance the war against the South. The Indians were in the path of the expanding valuable mineral hunt and settlement. One tribe that fought this expansion were the Apaches. First the Mescalero and then the Chiricahua. The Apache bands were led by Cochise, Victorio, the Chiricahua band was led by famous Geronimo. Geronimo led the most famous Native American resistance and it cost the U.S. government over $40 Million dollars to kill 100 Indians. Geronimo was caught and forced to live in the Southeast where many of the Apaches died. Geronimo died as a captive in 1909 in Oklahoma, far from his mountain home. The speakers are Bob Haozous, a Chiricahua artist and Grace McNeley a Navajo cultural leader.

Tags:

Comments to “Apache Indian Resistance - Geronimo”

1. Kalei, on January 7th, 2009 at 11:56:35 Said:
   LONG LIVE GERONIMO!!!
2. Olwyn, on January 7th, 2009 at 12:19:34 Said:
   Dirty Mexican ? and you, Spaniard ? Spaniards killed a lot of inidans in American continet.
3. Arelis, on January 7th, 2009 at 12:42:33 Said:
   dirty mexicans
4. Deortun, on January 7th, 2009 at 13:05:32 Said:
   dago te i 2 am related 2 geronimo but i am only a cousin 2 him. in wicth descent r u sister
5. CRICHTON, on January 7th, 2009 at 13:28:31 Said:
   Kia ora e hoa ma. Thanks dear brothers and sisters of the Red Earth. My husband is a descendant of Geronimo. He looks very much like him even with a German father. The information helps makes sense of his resistance to find links to this history today at 70+ years of age. He speaks 6 languages, none of these his native tongue. This history is reality for all Earth peoples. To overcome these challenges will seek from us all a Sacred mind and intent to restore our humanity. Mauri Ora!
6. Trish, on January 7th, 2009 at 13:51:30 Said:
   :-(
7. Eglantine, on January 7th, 2009 at 14:14:29 Said:
   How absurd USA dare to speak for democracy after all they have is build on the bones of nations exterminated????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8. GYURKA, on January 7th, 2009 at 14:37:28 Said:
   hi was a king and sitting bull to the cuntry belongs to indians not to the white,,
9. Arturo, on January 7th, 2009 at 15:00:27 Said:
   an yet the government still doesn't allow allow free roaming peoples ~~~~ the U.S. fears the truly free people
10. MUATA, on January 7th, 2009 at 15:23:26 Said:
    It will take alot more study to finally rule out Neanderthal/ Peking Man related interaction with Sapiens entering their lands, but it does point to non-African humans having a common ancestor and either Mongoloid being a mutation of Caucasians or vice versa along the way. The presence of MCPH1 and such genes in non-African humans may well be however unethical some people will find it what sets us apart. Because there is something is us that either they are missing or that we have extra.
11. LINDBERG, on January 7th, 2009 at 15:46:25 Said:
    What you said is wrong on sooo many levels.
12. Willard, on January 7th, 2009 at 16:09:24 Said:
    Well yes , Negroids never managed to built any great civilization during the ancient or medieval times other than the ones who came in contact with North African civilizations like Carthage , Egypt ; even Native American (without using Iron) managed to built massive structures like those pyramids and excelled in Astronomy , Mathematics and Science .
13. LIRIENE, on January 7th, 2009 at 16:32:23 Said:
    Extinct as a species, but cro-magnon man is also extinct. On the European domination since the 17th century of course that's cultural when compared to Asians and Native Americans. I think my point is that Negroid peoples seem to lack our creativity. When I stated what I did for Neanderthals, I did it because its a good theory for why we (Europeans & Asians together) defer from them with regard development. I'd like to say again that I do not put Europeans above Asians - that includes Mongoids.
14. Hamal, on January 7th, 2009 at 16:55:22 Said:
    There is a devil in every body , which is curious and seeks the fruit of knowledge . And this devil makes man what he is . Leave that Bible of yours and read about Epicurus .
15. AHRIMAN, on January 7th, 2009 at 17:18:21 Said:
    This subject about our species and their different branches is of course interesting . Combing back to the point where Europeans dominated the world during the colonial age , we will see that it was not because of genetic differences , but the difference in people's mindset . The Renaissance paved the way for European supremacy , because people could think freely and not be bound by religious dogma . This was the greatest driving force behind the western world and so their dominated .
16. Lorene, on January 7th, 2009 at 17:41:20 Said:
    Since you are talking about wikipedia , why don't you check that page on Neanderthals again ? You will notice that they became extinct like various other offshoots of Homo Erectus , viz Peking man , java man , dwarf hominids ec cetra.
17. Jennelle, on January 7th, 2009 at 18:04:19 Said:
    Amzing how much variation came about purely in that short period and only in the range of the Neanderthals ;-) See we are now argeed that they were the first humans - i.e. an animal that controls fire, hunts in groups and cares for their sick. I am truly humbled.
18. Logistilla, on January 7th, 2009 at 18:27:18 Said:
    Less than modern humans as a ratio because they were big and strong. They had bigger brains than us - thats it. We now know that a brain size gene in us IS Neanderthal. FACT. It exist is at least 25% of Europeans, but only 5% of Africans. Would you like a link? Cor-Magnon man had a slopping forehead too - his head was more like a chimp than us.
19. AbderRahman, on January 7th, 2009 at 18:50:17 Said:
    But they weren't backward - on wikipedia the website you quoted they have a larger brain than us. Humbling is the word. When modern mans ancestor was little more than an animal they had a culture with music, fire and they were very successful hunters we now know. They weren't the primitive people we had been lead to believe for the last century. All this is fact - them becoming extinct however is theory.
20. JOSU, on January 7th, 2009 at 19:13:16 Said:
    U know why u hate it, cuz ur the gotdamn devil the bible speaks of.
21. Benton, on January 7th, 2009 at 19:36:15 Said:
    Look , I hate your religious fairy tales , like God , Santa , Tooth Fairy , UFO and Zeus , gnomes , dragons .. so cut the crap .
22. CLEOPATRA, on January 7th, 2009 at 19:59:14 Said:
    Neanderthals were backward , a two minute check on the internet reveals the fact . Infact they suffered the same fate as the Native Americans , with modern men from from Africa , here being the Europeans . Its actually worse , cuz they became extinct .
23. Jaimee, on January 7th, 2009 at 20:22:13 Said:
    The blond hair came into existence after the ice age , check wiki . 10,000 bc
24. Clare, on January 7th, 2009 at 20:45:12 Said:
    Check wiki again . In fact, the average Neandertal brain may have been slightly bigger from this perspective. The large heads and massive bodies of Neandertals , made brain weight to body weight ratio less than mordern humans . That is why they were less developed and lost in the race with the newer Cro-Magnons . Lastly , they didn't have a chin and had large sloppy foreheads , which all humans from africa to america had .
25. Saunderson, on January 7th, 2009 at 21:08:11 Said:
    Genetic drift, founder effects, relaxation of natural selection, etc. But these factors could not have produced such a wide variety of hair and eye hues in the 35,000 years that modern humans have inhabited Europe. The hair-color gene (MC1R) has at least 7 alleles that exist only in Europe and the same is probably true for the eye-color gene (OCA2). If we take the hypothesis of a relaxation of selection, nearly a million years would be needed to accumulate this amount of diversity - quoted.

Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website